Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Regence Blue Shield Announces Reduced Benefits

This month Regence Blue Shield of Washington unveiled significant changes to their Washington health insurance plans. Regence is replacing all their current individual and family plans with their new “Evolve” plans. Although Regence is not yet requiring customers with their existing Washington health insurance plans to move to these new plans, we think that will happen within the next year or so. That means that if you have a current Regence plan, you would be forced to change to one of their new plan designs at some point in the future.

So how do these new plans compare to Regence’s current offerings? From a cost standpoint it seems that in many cases we will see similar costs when comparing new plans to comparable current plans. If the preliminary rate structure they provided is adopted, pricing will not change significantly, rather it is the benefits that will decrease.

The biggest changes are in the areas of coverage and coverage limitations. Some of these new plans contain exclusions that could have a significant negative financial impact on their policyholders. For instance, none of the new plans allow you to see the doctor as many times you like for a simple copay. Instead, their richest benefit plans now only allow you to see a doctor 4 times a year with a copay, after that you’re going to start paying the entire cost of subsequent doctors visits until you have met your annual deductible. Also, in many of the plans the coinsurance (the amount you pay after reaching your annual deductible) has increased, causing a higher maximum out of pocket expense if you were to become seriously ill.

Regence will also join fellow Washington Health Insurance company Lifewise and now charge for each child in a family. Their old pricing structure only charged for up to two children in a family plan no matter how many children are on the plan (Group Health still only charges for a maximum of two children). This was a nice benefit to large families with more than two children that already experience greater expenses due to their size.

So to summarize, Regence is keeping prices for their Washington State Health Insurance Plans relatively stable, but cutting benefits when you do need to seek medical care. Ultimately this shifts the costs from the insurance company to consumers, especially those with more than two children.

Being that Regence is the largest provider of Washington health insurance how will the other providers react to these changes? Time will tell.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Confused about Health Care Reform? You're not alone.

I have received questions from many clients over the last several months asking about what health care reform means and what it will or will not do. Unfortunately, I myself have more questions than answers. Here are the questions I think we need to ask ourselves, and be able to answer, before deciding to either support, not support, or partially support “Reform”.

1. Which bill(s) are we referring to? There are over 6 bills circulating right now and the two front runners are likely to be merged soon.
2. What is the effect of the over 1,200 amendments to these bills? Will the amendments done at the request of the special interests neutralize any positive aspects intended? (Health Insurance Agents like myself just had a successful amendment added, can you guess what is was?)
3. What is the main problem we are trying to solve? Health Care spending or covering as many uninsured as possible? They are inversely related and none of the current bills adequately address both.
4. Do we want competition, regulation, de-regulation across state lines, etc.?
5. Will reform make us healthier, or just provide more customers to the health care and prescription drug industry?
6. Will the reform efforts help/make us change our lifestyles, the only way we will ever get healthier as a nation?
7. Should we bring back Richard Simmons and “Sweating to the Oldies”?
8. Would mandated insurance coverage for all be of enough benefit to outweigh the loss of personal choice?
9. ?

I appreciate hearing so much feedback from all of you, so let me know what questions you think we should be asking!

Labels: , , ,